What is the difference between ansys and abaqus

Please keep in mind I am an Abaqus user and I mostly created the solid mechanic models so… Solid mechanic and vibration model: Both have enough accuracy and you might be able to get the acceptable results. Example: I had a friend who runs a model of a car moving on a 1 Km road to test the vibration in the suspension system.

Coding: Definitely, Abaqus is a better option. Job-to-job model Sometimes, we need to create models after some model. In General: For small and complex models: Abaqus. Thank you for publishing this awesome article. Remona 15 Oct Reply. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Comment. Enter your name or username to comment. Enter your email address to comment.

What do you suggest? Abaqus allows the user to write Python based scripts for model generation and post-processing. The advantage is that Python is a popular open-source platform independent language www. You can also write GUI-based plug-ins. Your question is thought provoking and one that users of FEA are faced with deciding what software to use for sure.

As mentioned, each software has their strong points and their weak points. It seems you are involved in in Civil Engineering, so you might find the bridge analysis being performed with Abaqus interesting.

Our services team in our Central region peformed analysis for the Minnesota bridge collapse. As to activity levels of Abaqus on this site, I think Abaqus users are very active and interested in asking questions and sharing their experiences. This feature makes it extremely powerful, robust and easy to use moving from one field to the other onejust one click away of geometrical no-linear or material models. Simulia has a strong committment with their customer as one can rapidly find out.

Every question that I posted to their web site was timely and precisely answered. Today I received a phone call as it was every time in the past from Simulia call center asking from a specific issue about the use of CAXA finite element that I had sent to them.

Today, many industries and public institutions have moved to Simulia in recognition of capabilities that make Simulia the best among the major players available in the marketplace. Today, it definitely changed and probably, the fact that Simulia GUI came somewhat late was advantageous, because it could took advantage of the last advances in graphics technology.

It looks like any CAD package and features all of their advantages by manipulating 3D objects naturally, efficiently and robustly. Going to Simulia wab page to take a look will surely get you so impressed as myself when was introduced some months ago in this fascinating world. Thank you very much for all the wonderful comments that I have received from all of you.

As part of my education I will try to learn how to Abaqus. Skip to main content. Search form Search. Secondary menu recent posts user list about contact Main menu research education mechanician opinion software industry conference job video.

Create new account Request new password. Navigation Search iMechanica. Recent blog posts Advanced Materials and Manufacturing group at Cornell seeking PhD applicants Fully-funded openings for PhD students in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Kentucky Pune unnecessarily has too many private universities, don't you think so?

Writing a paper Writing a proposal in situ Mechanics tensor tensor and its invariants. You are here Home » Blogs » Mario Juha's blog. Thank you, Mario J. Juha www. Some of options offered are differed between software. Abaques structural analysis some what good.

If you don't receive the email within an hour and you've checked your Spam folder , email us as confirmation grabcad. Ask and answer engineering questions Join the Community.

Good afternoon, I must to start first of all with an remarks: none exist some software better than other from specified above. Now, you must take in account the following assumption before to start learning some of them: -both software have direct interface with CAD soft: 3D or 2D model already made in CAD soft can be import directly in FEM soft through 1 click ; -because of investment of money in research and developed, both software offer guaranty of precision and stability of calculus and also in scalability; -because I am a user of ANSYS, I can tell you that using 1 window I can start multiple simulation-Workbench-without take into account that in work page I have include structural analysis or thermal or CFD or parametric study or mixed , perhaps Abaqus have also this possibility, I don't know; What I want to mean through this small comparative is that all software with tradition in numerical analysis offers the same capabilities more or less in the details of setup.

I hope is useful for you my suggestion.